SSCPI
Launched September 2026 · updated monthly
Global supply chains are vulnerable to geopolitical shocks (e.g., shipping disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz during the 2026 Iran war), climate extremes (e.g., drought-related restrictions on Panama Canal traffic), and global health crises (e.g., production shutdowns and transport disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic). Such economic, geopolitical, and environmental vulnerabilities can have severe consequences for firms and the Swiss economy as a whole. The Swiss Supply Chain Pressure Index (SSCPI) assesses the impact of supply chain vulnerabilities on Swiss firms and the Swiss economy. It is expressed in standard deviations from its long-run average from 2019 to the present: positive values indicate above-average pressure, negative values below-average.
1-month change
3-month change
1-year change
Several movements of the index align with known shocks, supporting its construct validity. The sharp spike in spring 2020 reflects the first COVID wave and China's factory shutdowns. The sustained climb afterwards captures additional shutdowns, Ever Given blockage of the Suez Canal in March 2021, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Although the war in Ukraine continued, supply chain pressure declined from autumn 2022 onward, likely reflecting gradual adaptation to the wartime environment and the phasing out of COVID-19 disruptions. The years 2024 and 2025 reflect lower supply chain pressure compared to the preceding turbulent period, with the index settling into a stable, slightly-below-average range. In 2026, the index returns above its long-run average for the first time in roughly three years, likely reflecting the 2026 Iran war and associated disruptions to shipping around the Strait of Hormuz.
Global supply chains are vulnerable to disruptions caused by geopolitical shocks, climate extremes, health crises, and shortages resulting from geopolitical tensions or export restrictions. Examples include shipping disruptions during the ongoing Iran war, restrictions on Panama Canal traffic due to drought, the disruptions caused by the pandemic, and shortages of critical materials following trade and export restrictions. These disruptions can have severe operational and financial consequences. The increasing complexity of modern supply chains, driven by global sourcing, outsourcing, multiple tiers, and geographically dispersed networks, can further increase firms’ exposure and vulnerability (Wagner & Bode, 2009; Bode & Wagner, 2015).
Recent approaches quantify the pressure on supply chains resulting from economic, geopolitical, and environmental vulnerabilities using global and national indices (Benigno et al., 2022; Friesenbichler et al., 2026). Building on these methodologies, the Swiss Supply Chain Pressure Index (SSCPI) offers a systematic way to measure pressure on Swiss supply chains. This is significant given the potential impact of such pressures on firms and the Swiss economy. The SSCPI is expressed in standard deviations from its long-run average since 2019. Positive values indicate above-average pressure, and negative values indicate below-average pressure. The index reports changes relative to one month, three months, and one year earlier.
Data collection is closely aligned with the Austrian Supply Chain Pressure Index (Friesenbichler et al., 2026). Following this approach, we collect two types of data.
Primarily, Swiss industry perceptions are exploited via manager surveys. Sub-indices of the Swiss Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) approximate supplier delivery times, backlog of orders, and stock of purchases in industrial production. Survey data from the Swiss Economic Institute (KOF) indicate shortages in material and equipment for the manufacturing and construction sector. While manager perceptions provide essential industry perspectives, survey data are exposed to potential biases (e.g., Bertrand & Mullainathan, 2001). Thus, global and Europe-specific transport price data are included to reflect more objective scarcity signals in the market. Bulk shipping costs are captured by the Baltic Exchange Dry Index. Container shipping is approximated by the cost of shipping goods from North America (New York) and Asia (Shanghai) to Europe (Rotterdam). Likewise, air cargo is approximated by the cost of shipping goods from North America (JFK/ ORD/ LAX) and Asia (PVG/ HKG/ ICN) to Europe (FRA). The port of Rotterdam is chosen as it is the biggest cargo seaport in Europe and well connected to Switzerland via the Rhine River system, road, and rail. Frankfurt is the biggest cargo airport in Europe and sits close to Switzerland in both geographic and economic terms.
All series enter in seasonally adjusted form so that recurring patterns are not mistaken for genuine pressure. Series for which a seasonally adjusted version is available are sourced directly as such. The remaining transportation cost series are adjusted using the X-13ARIMA-SEATS procedure (U.S. Census Bureau, 2025). The collected data are displayed in Table 1.
Table 1: Variables and data sources for index construction
| Category | Variables | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Core Data | ||
| Manager Perception | Swiss manufacturing PMI supplier delivery times, backlog of orders, stock of purchases | Procure.ch and UBS Switzerland via Macrobond |
| Manager Perception | Swiss manufacturing and construction material/equipment shortages | KOF Swiss Economic Institute |
| Transportation Cost | Baltic Exchange Dry Index | Baltic Exchange via Macrobond |
| Transportation Cost | Ocean cargo freight rates | Drewry via Macrobond |
| Transportation Cost | Air cargo freight rates | Drewry via Macrobond |
| Auxiliary data for backcasting, disaggregation, and demand adjustment (see Methodology) | ||
| Backcasting and disaggregation | Swiss manufacturing PMI quantity of purchases | Procure.ch and UBS Switzerland via Macrobond |
| Demand Adjusting | Swiss manufacturing new orders | KOF Swiss Economic Institute |
| Demand Adjusting | US manufacturing new orders | Institute for Supply Management (ISM) via Macrobond |
| Demand Adjusting | Chinese manufacturing new orders | China Federation of Logistics & Purchasing (CFLP) and National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) via Macrobond |
The methodology is based on the Global Supply Chain Pressure Index (Benigno et al., 2022) and the Austrian Supply Chain Pressure Index (Friesenbichler et al., 2026), and proceeds in three steps.
Note: t=time in months, NO=New Orders
Due to data constraints, the SSCPI for a given month is published at the beginning of the second following month (e.g., February's value is released in early April). Because the index is re-estimated over the full sample at each release, historical values are subject to revision when new data are added.
We gratefully acknowledge the support of the KOF Swiss Economic Institute at ETH Zurich for the Swiss Supply Chain Pressure Index, including the provision of underlying data. We particularly thank the KOF Business Tendency Surveys team and Klaus Abberger for their support.
Benigno, G., di Giovanni, J., Groen, J. J. J., & Noble, A. I. (2022). The GSCPI: A new barometer of global supply chain pressures (Staff Reports No. 1017). Federal Reserve Bank of New York. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4114973
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2001). Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data. American Economic Review, 91(2), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.67
Bode, C., & Wagner, S. M. (2015). Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions. Journal of Operations Management, 36, 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.12.004
Chow, G. C., & Lin, A. (1971). Best linear unbiased interpolation, distribution, and extrapolation of time series by related series. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 53(4), 372–375. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928739
Friesenbichler, K. S., Glocker, C., Hölzl, W., & Piribauer, P. (2026). Sectoral and aggregate effects of supply chain disruptions in a small open economy. Empirical Economics, 70(5), 69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-026-02920-7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2025). X-13ARIMA-SEATS Seasonal Adjustment Program. https://www.census.gov/data/software/x13as.html
Wagner, S. M., & Bode, C. (2009). Dominant risks and risk management practices in supply chains. In G. A. Zsidisin & B. Ritchie (Eds.), Supply chain risk: A handbook of assessment, management and performance (pp. 271–290). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79934-6_17